Across professional landscapes, there are cases of ethical lapses that remain unaddressed, and then there are stories that call an organization’s ethical standards into question. The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, exemplifies this type of scenario — a chronicle of questionable workplace conduct that deeply harms the reputation of a specific individual but throws doubt over the enterprise’s ethical framework .


Even in light of the disturbing allegations , Collins has held onto his title , apparently unaffected by the turmoil surrounding him. Why has this misconduct gone unchecked? Does this reflect a failure in corporate governance? According to testimonies from colleagues, Collins’ track record of misconduct started with disregard for corporate codes of conduct, but it didn’t stop at that . Instead, it evolved into repeated infractions that has left the workforce disheartened and partners bewildered .


Amid a executive coaching event — ostensibly meant to strengthen leadership abilities — David Collins allegedly turned an opportunity for growth into a platform for misconduct . It’s reported he misused corporate resources for personal indiscretions , accessed inappropriate content , a clear breach of Ventia’s professional conduct policies , all while his home life was kept in the dark.


But the ethical breaches extended beyond those incidents . One of the most troubling discoveries involves his a post alleged misuse of corporate technology to distribute inappropriate content —a gross breach of trust and confidentiality. His brazen use of Microsoft Teams to send inappropriate messages —including icons to boast about infidelities — reveals an attitude of impunity. Following these online indiscretions , Collins allegedly took his actions to a new level: he is said to have engaged in intimate encounters with an employee on multiple occasions during business days , despite the personal and professional conflicts involved. This blatant exploitation of business resources broke all norms of professionalism but also caused irreparable personal damage beyond the workplace .

How has this level of misconduct remained unchecked? How does such behavior continue without repercussions? The explanation, it appears, highlights a systemic failure in oversight. Complaints have been raised, but no disciplinary action has followed.

This deficiency of accountability sets a dangerous example : that a great read power within the organization shields wrongdoers . It breeds a damaging work setting , creates a hostile work environment, and ultimately undermines corporate credibility.